Skip to the main content.

Owner Approach

Focused on owner’s requirements, Conspectus offers an accurate, transparent view of how decisions made during the design process will ultimately impact project cost, construction quality, and building operations.

Services 

Owner Approach | Conspectus

 

Contact Us

    Architect Approach

    Focused on architect's requirements, Conspectus offers an accurate, transparent view of how decisions made during the design process will ultimately impact project cost, construction quality, and building operations.

    Services 

    Architects | Conspectus Inc

     

    Contact Us

      Design-Builder Approach

      Focused on design-builder's requirements, Conspectus offers an accurate, transparent view of how decisions made during the design process will ultimately impact project cost, construction quality, and building operations.

      Services 

      Design-Builders | Conspectus Inc

       

      Contact Us

        Construction Manager Approach

        Focused on construction manager's requirements, Conspectus offers an accurate, transparent view of how decisions made during the design process will ultimately impact project cost, construction quality, and building operations.

        Services 

        Construction Managers | Conspectus Inc

         

        Contact Us

          2 min read

          When a Specifier Engages in Magical Thinking

          One of the hallmarks of magical thinking is the notion that if you think a thing, you can make it happen, simply by thinking it.  This is often reinforced by our tendency to see connections between events and our propensity to interpret those connections as involving causation.  A specifier who engages in magical thinking anticipates that by writing something in a project specification, it will come to pass, no matter how nonsensical or wrong.

          Magical Thinking - A Case Study

          An architect we are working with hired a specialty consultant to help them design terra cotta-faced architectural precast concrete wall panels for a large university housing project.  Conspectus wrote the specifications for almost all the other architectural components on the project, and the specialty consultant provided the specifications for the precast wall panels.  We were asked by our client (the architect) to review and comment on the precast specifications.

          The third party specifier wrote the precast specs as a delegated
          design
          item.  This makes sense;
          portions of precast work, like internal reinforcing of the panels and
          attachment components required to hang the precast to the building structure
          are frequently delegated to the precaster's structural engineers.  They have the detailed knowledge necessary to
          engineer those elements.  The building
          code allows this, but limits the scope of delegated design to the portion of the
          work that can be designed by the contractor (or subcontract's) licensed
          professional.  In this case, the primary
          design professional retains responsibility for specifying the requirements to
          which the delegated design must perform.  

          The specialty consultant's specs, unfortunately, delegated
          far more responsibility to the contractor than reasonable.  One critical provision read:

          The Contractor shall design, engineer, test, fabricate, deliver, install, and guarantee all construction necessary to provide the [precast] as a complete airtight and watertight enclosure of the building.  The Contractor shall provide all materials, labor, equipment, and services necessary to this end.  The [precast] shall be complete in every respect, including all measures that may be required to that end, notwithstanding any omissions or inadequacies of Drawings and/or Specifications.

          Well!  It's in the
          specs so this is definitely going to happen, right?  The spec section goes on for another 40
          pages, but why bother? This one paragraph tells the contractor that he's
          responsible for everything, notwithstanding what's shown on the drawings and
          written in the other 40 pages of this spec section.  In fact, the spec attempts to transfer
          responsibility for not only the precast, but the entire building envelope!  Magic!

          The specification also attempted to force the contractor to
          take long-term financial responsibility for failures in the envelope, as
          follows:

          The Contractor shall agree to indemnify the [owner] and Architect against any defects in the design, workmanship, quality of materials, water-tightness or performance of the Work of this Section and to repair or replace defective design, workmanship or materials of the [precast] during the warranty period(s).

          Does the consultant think the contractor will agree to this?
          It's in the spec, so it will magically come to pass!  But this is a big problem.  This essentially amounts to the unlicensed
          practice of law since it is creating legal duties and obligations.  Also, it's unstated whether the clause only
          limits the contractor's liability for engineering failures discovered after the
          end of the warranty but still within the statutes of limitation and repose.

          By including this in the project manual along with the rest
          of the specifications, the architect is likely changing the risk profile for
          himself and the owner in unintended ways.

          Conclusion

          Design professionals need to understand the limits of delegated design, but more than that, they must understand the roles and responsibilities of various parties to a construction contract.  The author of this specification clearly understood neither, and created a spec containing unenforceable, nonsensical provisions that abdicated design responsibility and created massive risk for the whole team, especially if the owner doesn't understand and hasn't consented to what was being done. 

          The way to avoid magical thinking in specifications is to know the purpose of specifications, and respect what they can and cannot accomplish, and to make sure the owner is informed and consents to every material decision.

          Reflections of 30 Years | Conspectus

          Reflections of 30 Years

          The journey was an interconnected path, nearly 50 years in the making. Any one change could have dramatically altered the outcome. In the end I am...

          Read More

          Understanding Spec Tools - Advice from a Specifier

          Read the fine print, especially when changes are being made to a platform or tool that has a new release.  We highly encourage you to read the fine...

          Read More

          Rules of the Game: FIFA vs AEC, *Blog Bonus: World Cup Stadium Spec Secrets

          We are heading into the final game of the 2022 World Cup, and folks are placing their bets on Argentina or France. I want to take this opportunity to...

          Read More