Skip to the main content.

Owner Approach

Focused on owner’s requirements, Conspectus offers an accurate, transparent view of how decisions made during the design process will ultimately impact project cost, construction quality, and building operations.

Services 

Owner Approach | Conspectus

 

Contact Us

    Architect Approach

    Focused on architect's requirements, Conspectus offers an accurate, transparent view of how decisions made during the design process will ultimately impact project cost, construction quality, and building operations.

    Services 

    Architects | Conspectus Inc

     

    Contact Us

      Design-Builder Approach

      Focused on design-builder's requirements, Conspectus offers an accurate, transparent view of how decisions made during the design process will ultimately impact project cost, construction quality, and building operations.

      Services 

      Design-Builders | Conspectus Inc

       

      Contact Us

        Construction Manager Approach

        Focused on construction manager's requirements, Conspectus offers an accurate, transparent view of how decisions made during the design process will ultimately impact project cost, construction quality, and building operations.

        Services 

        Construction Managers | Conspectus Inc

         

        Contact Us

          2 min read

          Importance of Tables of Contents

          Tables of Contents are a valuable coordination tool to ensure the project manual includes everything required without duplication or conflict. The first step for writing construction specifications is to create the table of contents listing the expected spec sections from every design discipline on the project team. This first step allows discovery and correction of duplications, conflicts, and missing items before the spec is started.

          Yesterday, I received a phone call from an architect wondering why epoxy coated reinforcing was specified in the cast-in-place concrete spec for a project currently under construction. He insisted the last review issue of the specification included only galvanized and pain finish reinforcing.

          We wrote the structural specifications, so I opened the last file we issued for bidding to check. No epoxy coating; only galvanized and plain finishes were included. So what happened? Why is the bid issue spec different? Only one cast-in-place concrete section is shown in the table of contents and only one section is included in the project manual -  the one with epoxy coating.

          Thanks to a great utility, FileLocatorPro, I was able to quickly search the entire project record for files named 03300 with the word epoxy in the file. And there was the culprit. We received a set of Word files from the architect that were "issued for bid" with two sections 03300 - the section we wrote for the structural engineer for the building, and the one the civil engineers wrote for the site work. The civil engineer's section contained the epoxy coating.

          Only the civil engineer's section was published in the project manual. So no vapor retarder is included for the slab-on-grade that is barely above the ground water table. No architectural finishing was included for the exposed concrete foundation and site retaining walls. No special testing was included to meet code requirements for buildings. You get the picture.

          After some discussion with the architect, the rush of assembling the project manual came back in a flash. We already delivered the architectural and structural specs with the table of contents for printing. The civil engineers delivered their documents directly to the architect. During the final project manual assembly, the structural engineer's concrete section was removed - probably because there were two sections with  identical section numbers and section titles. Obviously the sections were the same, despite having different file names.

          Did I mention this was a publicly bid project and that issuing the correct concrete section for the building will probably result in a change order before the first footing is dug? An embarrassment for the design team that could have been easily avoided.

          Tables of Contents are a valuable coordination tool. Insist the spec lists be completed early and updated with each design phase and each spec issue.

          Reflections of 30 Years | Conspectus

          Reflections of 30 Years

          The journey was an interconnected path, nearly 50 years in the making. Any one change could have dramatically altered the outcome. In the end I am...

          Read More

          Understanding Spec Tools - Advice from a Specifier

          Read the fine print, especially when changes are being made to a platform or tool that has a new release.  We highly encourage you to read the fine...

          Read More

          Rules of the Game: FIFA vs AEC, *Blog Bonus: World Cup Stadium Spec Secrets

          We are heading into the final game of the 2022 World Cup, and folks are placing their bets on Argentina or France. I want to take this opportunity to...

          Read More